|
 The self-titled perfume designer Lolita Lempicka, released in 1997, has been raised in comparison with its notable precursor, Thierry Mugler Angel, even before it became a bestseller, despite the fact that perfumers Lolita Lempicka insisted that their flavor was more floral. But, still, of the many unique Angel, as far as I can assume, Lolita Lempicka may be the most successful, and in the commercial (he was the leader of sales), and in an artistic sense.
And it is more floral. Perfyumer Annick Menardo developed Lolita Lempicka and she toned down some of the dark, harsh elements Angel, replaced them with a sweet, soft notes, less motivating blend of violet, iris and licorice (notes of ivy leaves, flowers, licorice, anise seeds, cherry, violet, iris , vanilla, praline, tonka bean, vanilla and musk). Top notes are pretty sharp and fruit; then they go deep into a warm flavor with caustic, rough basis, but, nevertheless, edible due chocolate and vanilla. There are subtle hints of tobacco smoke that slip at the end.
I first "met" Angel, when I received samples of the spray a few years ago. It was the beginning of my career, perfume and flavor, flowing from the vial was so sharp that I first "isolated" him away, put it in the bag, but when it stopped working, I still dared to breathe. And now I almost fell in love with him, despite the wish that his fans have used this fragrance in less generous quantities.
As for Lolita Lempicka - it probably is too sweet for me, but it surpasses all sweet scents, and is not overly sugared. It is a fragrance than the Angel, and the combination of smoky notes presents something secretive, so to speak, the aura of "good girl / bad girl." Using Angel for a few days next week I finally decided that preference is given to still more straight-Angel.
Author: Ann, New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
